a. How are the text features different?
The Singapore article has more headings and a title(with bold) while the NAT Geo webpage only has a title. The NAT Geo webpage has a box of "fast facts" while the Singapore articles has paragraphs and points.
b. What are some examples of information you can find on the NAT Geo webpage but not on the Singapore zoo webpage?
Mostly facts about orang-utan, when the Singapore Zoo is more about the facilities of the zoo.
c. Which report appeals to you more? Why?
The NAT Geo webpage, I prefer information and facts about animals than the facilities of an area which does not interest me.